Articles | Documents | Equipment | Events | Links | Membership | Miscellaneous | Scrapbook | Targets | What's New |
Motorized Travel Restrictions in Arizona’s National Forests | April 2016 | ||||
by Bruce Rogers |   | ||||
Anyone who drives into National Forest lands for recreation, whether for hunting,
camping, or just exploring, needs to be aware of the significant changes to the road
network and the laws regarding motorized travel that have been implemented in the
last few years.
The Forest Service has been under a mandate since 2005 to develop plans for all of
the national forests as a result of new regulations (Travel Management Rule, 36 CFR
212). The TMR requires that each forest analyze their policies and road networks,
and generate a plan to control motorized access to “designated roads and areas only.”
Not surprisingly, the result has been a significant increase in restrictions.
Coconino National Forest TMR Process
In 2006 & 2007, the Forest Service solicited public input (albeit rather quietly) and
surveyed the existing road system. They released a “Proposed Action” report in late
2008 describing their intent to change the rules for motorized travel based on a
belief that too many roads exist and that off-road travel is damaging. In 2009-2011
various plans and Environmental Impact Statements were generated describing proposed
alternatives and rationale.
In September 2011, the “Record of Decision” was released announcing the selection of
Alternative 3A. The plan reduced the open road mileage to 3097 (over 50% cut) and
restricted off road travel to big game (elk) retrieval only, within 1 mile of an open
road. This cut the accessible area by ⅓ for game retrieval. Also, motorized camping
was restricted to within 30 feet of an open road, or up to 300 feet in “designated
corridors.” This reduced the theoretically-available area for motorized camping to
only 3% of the forest acreage.
These new rules went into effect in May 2012. The Forest Service now issues annually
a paper Motor Vehicle User Map indicating the remaining open roads and camping corridors.
There’s a PDF version on their website, and a Garmin-compatible electronic version as well.
What they did NOT do was make any attempt to mark closed roads with signage. There is
now a small sign at many major forest road entry points that says “USE ONLY ROADS AND
TRAILS SHOWN ON OFFICIAL MAP”. If you don’t have the map or haven’t heard about the rule
changes you might think this means “stay on roads that are marked with forest road numbers.”
That’s not the case - and in fact, the majority of numbered roads are now officially closed!
They’re still there, many in good shape, but there are no ROAD CLOSED signs. Nor are there
any markers for the designated parking or camping areas. (The Forest Service claims that
signage is too expensive and too easily vandalized to be practical).
A large proportion of existing, long-used dispersed camp sites with good parking, fire
rings, etc. are now officially off-limits. And the newly designated camping corridors
often include terrain that is unsuitable to actually camp on. The new rules, by design,
often put campsites too close to a well-traveled road, subjecting campers to dust & noise.
Enforcement Impractical; Public Poorly Informed
In my experience – talking to folks I met using forest roads or camped nearby – most
users still don’t know much about the changes. Every summer since 2012, I have seen
campers in “off limits” sites and obvious signs of use on “closed” roads. One major
reason for the lack of public knowledge is the apathy of print and TV media outside
the immediate area. The Forest Service publishes their proposed actions and announces
opportunities for public input in the nearest newspaper to the affected forest, which
for the Coconino is Flagstaff’s Arizona Daily Sun. The Sun has published a number of
articles and editorial comments on the subject and taken a balanced stance. But
even though the majority of forest users – hunters and campers - probably travel from
the Phoenix area, the Arizona Republic has steadfastly refused to cover the issue. I
contacted their outdoors reporter in 2008 and was told there was “no interest” in the
story.
The forest service has made an attempt to contact campers and hand out maps on certain
roads, and on some of the more popular weekends. Later in the season, when deer and
elk hunters are afield, there seems to be very little presence at all. Nevertheless,
forest rangers can cite violators. In the 2013 and 2014 Travel Management Monitoring
Reports, statistics on enforcement activity were tabulated. Examples were made of
some off-roaders who caused significant damage or were involved in other criminal
activity, but most of the contacts were warnings. Enforcement is primarily focused
on sensitive areas and areas near private property or where complaints have been lodged.
A Warning to Hunters?
The Forest Service later walked this back a bit, saying they were not targeting hunters.
Their December 2013 press release reads in part “Forest visitors camping and actively
engaging in hunting or other recreational activities are not at risk of being cited or
having their property considered abandoned after 72 hours. Hunters and other campers
have never been required to move camp every 72 hours and will not be required to do so
in the future.”
Other Forests in Arizona
The Tonto NF has released a draft impact statement in June 2014 containing alternative
proposals which would result in closing between 5% and 75% of the existing roads. The
Forest Service has stated their preference for Alternative C, which would close 62% of
the roads.
The Apache-Sitgreaves NF has placed Travel Management on hold, claiming the Wallow
Fire of 2011 has delayed efforts. A Transportation Analysis has been published and
some alternatives have been produced. Currently, road maps are available showing open
and closed routes and designated camping areas. Camping near the Rim Lakes area has
been regulated for some time due to the popularity of the area.
You Can Influence the Process (Maybe…)
For the Coconino, the contact person is Mike Dechter, Travel Management Project Leader,
Coconino National Forest, 1824 South Thompson St., Flagstaff, AZ 86001; (928) 527-3620.
I have talked to Mike in the past; he’s a reasonable guy and understands the concerns but
he has a lot of conflicting opinions to reconcile. It would be good to add your comments
as they do seem to listen even if they move very slowly. I was pleasantly surprised to
find that one of my suggestions – reopening a road to a favorite camping spot – actually
made it into the list of proposed actions. The comment period for the proposed 2016
changes runs through July 31, 2016. Presumably any changes would not become effective
until the 2017 season.
The email address is comments-southwestern-coconino@fs.fed.us, or you can use their web
form linked below.
References
Coconino NF:
Coconino NF MVUM Comment Form:
Kaibab NF:
Prescott NF:
Tonto NF:
Apache-Sitgreaves NF:
Coconino County Sheriff:
AzGFD Warning to Hunters:
Forest Service “Clarification” Letter: © Honeywell Sportsman Club. All rights reserved. |
The Honeywell Sportsman Club is a small group of shooting and outdoor enthusiasts in the Phoenix, Arizona area. Our website is ad-free and completely free to use for everyone. But we do have expenses that we need to cover, such as the web hosting fee and our liability insurance. If you enjoyed visiting our website, found it useful in some way, or if you enjoyed reading this story, please consider tipping us through our PayPal donation jar below. Thanks for visiting, and come back soon. |
|
|